The Matrix of Theology
All theology begins with The Matrix of Four
We are all siblings. This is verified biologically of course, but perhaps more importantly for our understanding of one other, the unity of humanity is verifiable in our belief systems, in our spiritual ideas that are upriver from the rest of our thinking, and our creation stories from which stems our very concept of existence.
Many of the foundational stories and principles of religions can be boiled down to their mutual essence, which inarguably reveal their common origins. And although many people frequently get caught up with the difference of the feather rather than the similarity of the bird, so to speak, the common origins of religions and their central tenets is proof that – despite varying ‘faiths’ – we are more alike than we are different.
In today’s world, we have learned to use polarized, dualistic thinking — the opposition of two competing ideas, left and right, black and white. The very inquiry into the origins of human nature is typically posed through such a limited mindset: “Is it nature or nurture?” But what if the truth was somewhere in the middle? Or somewhere else entirely? In reality, to consider any information or situation comprehensively – including our belief systems and our origins – questions must be posed in four ways, not just two. “Is it one or the other, or neither or both?”
Applying The Matrix of Four to our thinking elevates individual consciousness to find alternatives, grey areas and potentials. And in the case of intimate theosophical understandings of our nature, it enables us to find commonality instead of divisiveness, bringing us ever closer to our collective truth.
Four is recognized as symbol for completion. This symbolism is illustrated in the four seasons, derived from the two solstices and two equinoxes of our orbit, and is represented in the four forms of arithmetic. Beyond that there are four aspects of self; the mental, physical, spiritual and the natural. These fundamental universal absolutes are alone powerful enough to be the sources of the Matrix of Four and its symbolism.
Correspondingly the Matrix of Four, the philosophy of the duality of polarity, is presented in the beginning of practically every creation story, whether the Popol Vuh or Genesis. Nearly all creation stories start with the polarity of Heaven and Earth followed by the polarity of male and female. In this respect the Matrix of Four is the basis of most all creation stories as well as being depicted in every cross that so many religions share.
Creation Stories and the Foundations of BeliefIslam, Judaism and Christianity all share a common creation story, from Genesis, the first story in The Bible. The polarities of Heaven and Earth are immediately described followed by the polarity of male and female. Then the first four characters are described. These first four characters set the tone for the rest of the story. The first two characters are God and Adam, the masculine. The next character is Eve, the feminine (as opposed to the masculine), and the fourth character is the serpent, the deceiver (as opposed to the creator). These four biblical archetypes at the basis of the bible, which form the basis of 3 major world religions, are more influential than we can reckon at this point. Beside illustrating the common origin of these religions, they also illustrate and conceptualize our archetypal thinking and being — the duality of polarity.
The Matrix of Four begins the Biblical creation story, is illustrated in the first four characters, and depicted in the cross — the definitive symbol of Christianity — but there are other biblical connections too. There are four gospels in the Bible; that of Mathew, John, Luke and Mark. The Hebrew word for God is a four letter word, YHWH (Yahweh), known as the tetragrammaton. The four letters are said to be symbolic of the four worlds of the Kabala; emanation, creation, formation, action. The Matrix of Four is also represented by the common saying in Kabala, “The wicked obey the law through fear; the wise keep the law through knowledge”, based on the polarities of wickedness and wisdom, fear and knowledge. Four is also central to the Hebrew celebration of Passover, in the four questions, four cups of wine and four expressions of redemption.
Four is also embedded into the ancient philosophies and creation stories of many Native American peoples, perhaps none so well-known as the Hopi, Navajo and Zuni peoples of the Southwest. Their stories celebrate four symbolically and philosophically in the symbol of the four-quartered cross within a circle, as well as other similar designs. Perhaps most significantly the Hopi believe we are living in the fourth world. Hopi tradition states the first world was Endless Space, the second was Dark Midnight, the third was the Age of Animals and the fourth is the World Complete. Four migrations were written upon four sacred tablets which man was supposed to undertake once in this fourth world — to separate into smaller tribes and began to migrate in four different directions, settling in new lands.
Thousands of miles away and centuries before the establishment of the Hopi and Navajo, the Mayan creation story — the Popol Vuh — told of four gods and four first men. The four Vedas (Sanskrit for “knowledge”) are the foundational scriptures in Hindu theology: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types: the Aranyakas (rituals and ceremonies), the Brahmanas (commentaries), and the Upanishads (meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge) and the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions). In turn, the Samhitas for example are grouped into four categories: the Rig-Veda, Sama-Veda, Yajur-Veda, and Atharva-Veda.
One could go on about the number of occurrences of four in the Old and New Testaments, but its representation in the cross symbol adopted by Christianity, Judaism and Islam, its presence in the creation story, and its basis in the four worlds of the Kabala are alone reflective of its major significance.
Clear examples of the cross are used in many theologies, not just Christianity and Islam.
The universality of the cross in Hindu, Taoist, Native American, Egyptian, Celtic and Judeo-Christian theology and symbolism illustrates its archetypal noteworthiness and hints at the commonality among human spirituality and theology. Jesus, Moses and dozens of other figures from the Old Testament also appear in the Quran, the central scripture of Islam, which literally translates as “the recitation”. The Quran describes the polarities of believers and unbelievers as well as peacemakers and mischief-makers. These four characterizations are frequently noted in the Quran and form the basis of its characterization model.
An elaborate variation of the cross, the swastika, was used throughout the world for thousands of years before the Nazis adopted it. It was used by American Indians from Saskatchewan to Central America. The Kuna people of Panama believe the swastika shape represents the octopus that created the world in all four directions. The Swastika was used by the ancient Greeks to represent movement in art as early as the eighth century BC. The Hindus used it for thousands of years and it is still a holy symbol among Hindus, in Buddhism and Jainism. Jain temples and texts must contain a swastika and it is essential to begin Jain ceremonies. The Sanskrit word swastika means auspicious object and it is often displayed with four dots at the four angled arms. The swastika is representative of totality. And like all crosses it is also representative the matrix of four — the duality of polarity.
The Ancient Egyptian cross is the Ankh. It is one of the oldest and most distinguished crosses. The top section is not a line, but an oval. The mysterious symbol is said to represent eternal life. The ankh has four parts, two matching lines, one longer line and a wholly distinct fourth part, the oval. Hieroglyphs show Egyptian gods carrying one or a pair of ankhs and various sarcophaguses depict buried royalty holding ankhs. The ankh symbol was later adopted by Coptic Christians.
Nearly every form of theology and ancient philosophy points to the Matrix of Four, and its potentiation, whether subtly or not so subtly. This potentiation results from the duality of polarity — the contrast of the divine with the demonic, and our elemental physicality with our elaborate spirituality. Like Adam and Eve, we choose. According to the Bible, God gave Adam and Eve the gift of moral agency — the freedom of choice — Eden and expulsion. This idea is visible in Christianity, Judaism and Islam, as well as nearly all other theology, with varying interpretations.
Although some people believe there can be no interpretation of holy books at all — that there is only one truth (usually their own) — the fact is that all religious and philosophical texts might be interpreted differently by different people, depending on their level of conscious awareness. A critical divergence in their interpretation is firstly between the literal and the allegorical, and secondly, whether the story is reflective of internal spirituality or external physicality.
For instance, as noted Islamic tradition refers to four characterizations in the external world — believers and unbelievers, peacemakers and mischief-makers — however some hold it is possible that this is, at least in part, reflective of the illustration of our internal state of consciousness, our thinking as well as the resulting external being. Of course this interpretation idea and the divergence of literal and allegorical interpretations of theology may be considered blasphemous to some and quelled instead of rewarded.
According to The Zohar, a Kabalistic text first publicly known in the 13th century, there are four ways to interpret theology which lead to ascension. Ascension is said to be like shedding the cocoon of unconscious ignorance and developing the butterfly of consciousness. Again, this concept is based on the duality of polarity, as ascension of both the self and the collective consciousness begins with breaking – or not – the patterns which unknowingly cause unhappiness.
The theological interpretive formula reflective of The Matrix of Four is called The Four PaRDeS. The capitalized letters represent the four aspects of this formula, translated from Hebrew (in such translations vowels are ignored). Each type of PRDS examines the meaning of a text; the Peshat means the literal or contextual meaning of the text, Remez is the allegorical meaning, Derashincludes the metaphorical or comparative meaning, and Sod represents the hidden meaning. Legend has it understanding this formation of four is a final step on the path to ascension. Notably, the combination of the letters PRDS is similar to paradise, where ascension through consideration of the four aspects is said to lead.
The first two are obvious, while the comparative and hidden levels of interpretation are more subtle and require more to decipher. And while the more complex modes of awareness are often left unconsidered by many people, still constrained to the left/right mode of thinking, awareness of The Four PRDS of interpretation and The Matrix of Four as a mode of thinking, is a valuable tool not just in understanding theological presentation but also in understanding our society. When extrapolated as a lens to view society, The Four PRDS can be applied firstly by our surface understanding; our individual senses. The secondary more elaborate layer of understanding our society arrives in the teachings of others; the third is a combination of collective learning and our own experience used comparatively; the fourth is the intuitive approach, where one cannot explain exactly how one reaches an answer but the answer is nonetheless a useful and truthful one.
Understanding and striving toward these interpretive modes of thinking can enhance both our intuitive and critical understanding of our collective and individual nature. We have the potential to be either materialistically driven or spiritually driven, and we can be either war-makers or peace-makers.
Many of the foundational stories and principles of religions can be boiled down to their mutual essence, which inarguably reveal their common origins. And although many people frequently get caught up with the difference of the feather rather than the similarity of the bird, so to speak, the common origins of religions and their central tenets is proof that – despite varying ‘faiths’ – we are more alike than we are different.
In today’s world, we have learned to use polarized, dualistic thinking — the opposition of two competing ideas, left and right, black and white. The very inquiry into the origins of human nature is typically posed through such a limited mindset: “Is it nature or nurture?” But what if the truth was somewhere in the middle? Or somewhere else entirely? In reality, to consider any information or situation comprehensively – including our belief systems and our origins – questions must be posed in four ways, not just two. “Is it one or the other, or neither or both?”
Applying The Matrix of Four to our thinking elevates individual consciousness to find alternatives, grey areas and potentials. And in the case of intimate theosophical understandings of our nature, it enables us to find commonality instead of divisiveness, bringing us ever closer to our collective truth.
Four is recognized as symbol for completion. This symbolism is illustrated in the four seasons, derived from the two solstices and two equinoxes of our orbit, and is represented in the four forms of arithmetic. Beyond that there are four aspects of self; the mental, physical, spiritual and the natural. These fundamental universal absolutes are alone powerful enough to be the sources of the Matrix of Four and its symbolism.
Correspondingly the Matrix of Four, the philosophy of the duality of polarity, is presented in the beginning of practically every creation story, whether the Popol Vuh or Genesis. Nearly all creation stories start with the polarity of Heaven and Earth followed by the polarity of male and female. In this respect the Matrix of Four is the basis of most all creation stories as well as being depicted in every cross that so many religions share.
Creation Stories and the Foundations of BeliefIslam, Judaism and Christianity all share a common creation story, from Genesis, the first story in The Bible. The polarities of Heaven and Earth are immediately described followed by the polarity of male and female. Then the first four characters are described. These first four characters set the tone for the rest of the story. The first two characters are God and Adam, the masculine. The next character is Eve, the feminine (as opposed to the masculine), and the fourth character is the serpent, the deceiver (as opposed to the creator). These four biblical archetypes at the basis of the bible, which form the basis of 3 major world religions, are more influential than we can reckon at this point. Beside illustrating the common origin of these religions, they also illustrate and conceptualize our archetypal thinking and being — the duality of polarity.
The Matrix of Four begins the Biblical creation story, is illustrated in the first four characters, and depicted in the cross — the definitive symbol of Christianity — but there are other biblical connections too. There are four gospels in the Bible; that of Mathew, John, Luke and Mark. The Hebrew word for God is a four letter word, YHWH (Yahweh), known as the tetragrammaton. The four letters are said to be symbolic of the four worlds of the Kabala; emanation, creation, formation, action. The Matrix of Four is also represented by the common saying in Kabala, “The wicked obey the law through fear; the wise keep the law through knowledge”, based on the polarities of wickedness and wisdom, fear and knowledge. Four is also central to the Hebrew celebration of Passover, in the four questions, four cups of wine and four expressions of redemption.
Four is also embedded into the ancient philosophies and creation stories of many Native American peoples, perhaps none so well-known as the Hopi, Navajo and Zuni peoples of the Southwest. Their stories celebrate four symbolically and philosophically in the symbol of the four-quartered cross within a circle, as well as other similar designs. Perhaps most significantly the Hopi believe we are living in the fourth world. Hopi tradition states the first world was Endless Space, the second was Dark Midnight, the third was the Age of Animals and the fourth is the World Complete. Four migrations were written upon four sacred tablets which man was supposed to undertake once in this fourth world — to separate into smaller tribes and began to migrate in four different directions, settling in new lands.
Thousands of miles away and centuries before the establishment of the Hopi and Navajo, the Mayan creation story — the Popol Vuh — told of four gods and four first men. The four Vedas (Sanskrit for “knowledge”) are the foundational scriptures in Hindu theology: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types: the Aranyakas (rituals and ceremonies), the Brahmanas (commentaries), and the Upanishads (meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge) and the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions). In turn, the Samhitas for example are grouped into four categories: the Rig-Veda, Sama-Veda, Yajur-Veda, and Atharva-Veda.
One could go on about the number of occurrences of four in the Old and New Testaments, but its representation in the cross symbol adopted by Christianity, Judaism and Islam, its presence in the creation story, and its basis in the four worlds of the Kabala are alone reflective of its major significance.
Clear examples of the cross are used in many theologies, not just Christianity and Islam.
The universality of the cross in Hindu, Taoist, Native American, Egyptian, Celtic and Judeo-Christian theology and symbolism illustrates its archetypal noteworthiness and hints at the commonality among human spirituality and theology. Jesus, Moses and dozens of other figures from the Old Testament also appear in the Quran, the central scripture of Islam, which literally translates as “the recitation”. The Quran describes the polarities of believers and unbelievers as well as peacemakers and mischief-makers. These four characterizations are frequently noted in the Quran and form the basis of its characterization model.
An elaborate variation of the cross, the swastika, was used throughout the world for thousands of years before the Nazis adopted it. It was used by American Indians from Saskatchewan to Central America. The Kuna people of Panama believe the swastika shape represents the octopus that created the world in all four directions. The Swastika was used by the ancient Greeks to represent movement in art as early as the eighth century BC. The Hindus used it for thousands of years and it is still a holy symbol among Hindus, in Buddhism and Jainism. Jain temples and texts must contain a swastika and it is essential to begin Jain ceremonies. The Sanskrit word swastika means auspicious object and it is often displayed with four dots at the four angled arms. The swastika is representative of totality. And like all crosses it is also representative the matrix of four — the duality of polarity.
The Ancient Egyptian cross is the Ankh. It is one of the oldest and most distinguished crosses. The top section is not a line, but an oval. The mysterious symbol is said to represent eternal life. The ankh has four parts, two matching lines, one longer line and a wholly distinct fourth part, the oval. Hieroglyphs show Egyptian gods carrying one or a pair of ankhs and various sarcophaguses depict buried royalty holding ankhs. The ankh symbol was later adopted by Coptic Christians.
Nearly every form of theology and ancient philosophy points to the Matrix of Four, and its potentiation, whether subtly or not so subtly. This potentiation results from the duality of polarity — the contrast of the divine with the demonic, and our elemental physicality with our elaborate spirituality. Like Adam and Eve, we choose. According to the Bible, God gave Adam and Eve the gift of moral agency — the freedom of choice — Eden and expulsion. This idea is visible in Christianity, Judaism and Islam, as well as nearly all other theology, with varying interpretations.
Although some people believe there can be no interpretation of holy books at all — that there is only one truth (usually their own) — the fact is that all religious and philosophical texts might be interpreted differently by different people, depending on their level of conscious awareness. A critical divergence in their interpretation is firstly between the literal and the allegorical, and secondly, whether the story is reflective of internal spirituality or external physicality.
For instance, as noted Islamic tradition refers to four characterizations in the external world — believers and unbelievers, peacemakers and mischief-makers — however some hold it is possible that this is, at least in part, reflective of the illustration of our internal state of consciousness, our thinking as well as the resulting external being. Of course this interpretation idea and the divergence of literal and allegorical interpretations of theology may be considered blasphemous to some and quelled instead of rewarded.
According to The Zohar, a Kabalistic text first publicly known in the 13th century, there are four ways to interpret theology which lead to ascension. Ascension is said to be like shedding the cocoon of unconscious ignorance and developing the butterfly of consciousness. Again, this concept is based on the duality of polarity, as ascension of both the self and the collective consciousness begins with breaking – or not – the patterns which unknowingly cause unhappiness.
The theological interpretive formula reflective of The Matrix of Four is called The Four PaRDeS. The capitalized letters represent the four aspects of this formula, translated from Hebrew (in such translations vowels are ignored). Each type of PRDS examines the meaning of a text; the Peshat means the literal or contextual meaning of the text, Remez is the allegorical meaning, Derashincludes the metaphorical or comparative meaning, and Sod represents the hidden meaning. Legend has it understanding this formation of four is a final step on the path to ascension. Notably, the combination of the letters PRDS is similar to paradise, where ascension through consideration of the four aspects is said to lead.
The first two are obvious, while the comparative and hidden levels of interpretation are more subtle and require more to decipher. And while the more complex modes of awareness are often left unconsidered by many people, still constrained to the left/right mode of thinking, awareness of The Four PRDS of interpretation and The Matrix of Four as a mode of thinking, is a valuable tool not just in understanding theological presentation but also in understanding our society. When extrapolated as a lens to view society, The Four PRDS can be applied firstly by our surface understanding; our individual senses. The secondary more elaborate layer of understanding our society arrives in the teachings of others; the third is a combination of collective learning and our own experience used comparatively; the fourth is the intuitive approach, where one cannot explain exactly how one reaches an answer but the answer is nonetheless a useful and truthful one.
Understanding and striving toward these interpretive modes of thinking can enhance both our intuitive and critical understanding of our collective and individual nature. We have the potential to be either materialistically driven or spiritually driven, and we can be either war-makers or peace-makers.